The guy you mention in the text is a prime example of someone who cloaks his own confusion in the guise of spirituality. It's widespread. The simple rule remains: if it creates an advantage, any disguise and any label is welcome. But that’s not truth. (If you’re interested: here’s a bit more about the polyamory game: https://vigorcalma.substack.com/p/polyamory )
Good points, and, yes, I do actually sage my home! And I do feel it helps. They do it at the lodge I attend, and it is powerful and cleansing ceremony there, so I do it at my home in the same way.
I just wrote a long article about the fourth turning, AION, and where were are at (end of the fake guru lalaland). I was talking about generations and degenarates. the more we speak up the better...
[…]
“🎭 The Simulacra and Cultural Noise
Mark Zuckerberg (1984)
→ Algorithmic overlord. Architect of filtered perception. Masters control, not consciousness.
Grimes (1988)
→ AI-mystic cosplay. Occasionally poetic, mostly brand simulation. The voice of the machine pretending to feel.
Aubrey Marcus (1981)
→ Sleaze in the skin of shamanism.
“Open relationships,” ayahuasca tourism, and performative “wokeness” sold as depth. Libido wrapped in a wisdom costume, always on-brand, always merch-ready. VOMIT EMOJI INCOMING> 🤮
"If you have come to "spirituality" because you think it is cool or you think cool people are spiritual and you want to play dress up and create a false identity to fit in to what you think is "spiritual", you will be in for a very rude awakening.
You will also be in for a rude awakening if you pedestalize leaders or teachers or think that grown adults are not responsible for themselves and their choices.
You should not be looking at the "influence" you should be looking at why you are "influenced".
Balancing cultural critique with Big Oneness Truth is tricky. On the one hand, it feels necessary to name inauthenticity, superficiality, etc. in service to Love. On the other, What Is is What Is: here are humans fumbling through life and consciousness with the tools and experiences available and afforded to them, just like you and I and Kirby the Plumber.
I don't say this in support or defense of Aubrey Marcus, it's just that he's one microbial vessel of awareness whose experiences and expression are as perfectly valid as your wish for his partner to experience deep devotional love. As well as whatever she's experiencing.
Totally. It doesn’t sound like you are very familiar with my work or the positions I hold but I always hold a yes and. I’m frankly more disturbed by the people who feel VIOLATED by him being himself because they were “influenced”.
AND I will always frame things through the lens of my teachings for women which is Divine Union.
Thank you for this. So much deep and incredible food for thought, and many things I had and fully considered and I'm grateful to be put face to face with. What an absolutely fantastic line: cultivating a sealed field with one partner. Love that
So that podcast stayed on my mind and I found it deeply disturbing. Essentially they met with this younger woman, drugged her, and now he's impregnating both of them.
hmm. I didn't watch the whole thing but I don't like to speak about women like they do not have agency. I believe both of these women are in full choice. Will they regret that choice? perhaps. But no one did anything to anyone here.
Well said, thank you 🦋
Thank you!
Awesome piece.. glad someone is telling it like it is 😌
Thank you
The guy you mention in the text is a prime example of someone who cloaks his own confusion in the guise of spirituality. It's widespread. The simple rule remains: if it creates an advantage, any disguise and any label is welcome. But that’s not truth. (If you’re interested: here’s a bit more about the polyamory game: https://vigorcalma.substack.com/p/polyamory )
Thank you
Good points, and, yes, I do actually sage my home! And I do feel it helps. They do it at the lodge I attend, and it is powerful and cleansing ceremony there, so I do it at my home in the same way.
That’s fine. I’m pointing to something specific.
based. thank you.
I just wrote a long article about the fourth turning, AION, and where were are at (end of the fake guru lalaland). I was talking about generations and degenarates. the more we speak up the better...
[…]
“🎭 The Simulacra and Cultural Noise
Mark Zuckerberg (1984)
→ Algorithmic overlord. Architect of filtered perception. Masters control, not consciousness.
Grimes (1988)
→ AI-mystic cosplay. Occasionally poetic, mostly brand simulation. The voice of the machine pretending to feel.
Aubrey Marcus (1981)
→ Sleaze in the skin of shamanism.
“Open relationships,” ayahuasca tourism, and performative “wokeness” sold as depth. Libido wrapped in a wisdom costume, always on-brand, always merch-ready. VOMIT EMOJI INCOMING> 🤮
https://www.monikabravo.blog/p/the-4th-turning-and-why-we-are-all
TOP:
"If you have come to "spirituality" because you think it is cool or you think cool people are spiritual and you want to play dress up and create a false identity to fit in to what you think is "spiritual", you will be in for a very rude awakening.
You will also be in for a rude awakening if you pedestalize leaders or teachers or think that grown adults are not responsible for themselves and their choices.
You should not be looking at the "influence" you should be looking at why you are "influenced".
Thank you!
Balancing cultural critique with Big Oneness Truth is tricky. On the one hand, it feels necessary to name inauthenticity, superficiality, etc. in service to Love. On the other, What Is is What Is: here are humans fumbling through life and consciousness with the tools and experiences available and afforded to them, just like you and I and Kirby the Plumber.
I don't say this in support or defense of Aubrey Marcus, it's just that he's one microbial vessel of awareness whose experiences and expression are as perfectly valid as your wish for his partner to experience deep devotional love. As well as whatever she's experiencing.
🤷
Totally. It doesn’t sound like you are very familiar with my work or the positions I hold but I always hold a yes and. I’m frankly more disturbed by the people who feel VIOLATED by him being himself because they were “influenced”.
AND I will always frame things through the lens of my teachings for women which is Divine Union.
Phenomenal take. You’re a beautiful voice of reason and spiritual groundedness!
Thank you!
Thank you for this. So much deep and incredible food for thought, and many things I had and fully considered and I'm grateful to be put face to face with. What an absolutely fantastic line: cultivating a sealed field with one partner. Love that
Mmm yeah it has been such a beautiful blessing in my own life. I am fortunate to have an incredible partner to share that with.
Can one realize/express Divine Union without committing to a monogamous relationship?
That’s a great question. I would say you can experience it, but for it to be an actualization would require a sealed field.
The sealing, would that be conscious intention? Visualization? Or do you mean something like ceremonial magic? All of the above? 🤔😊
Absolutely conscious. Marriage can accomplish this. But also energetic practice, no leaks.
So that podcast stayed on my mind and I found it deeply disturbing. Essentially they met with this younger woman, drugged her, and now he's impregnating both of them.
hmm. I didn't watch the whole thing but I don't like to speak about women like they do not have agency. I believe both of these women are in full choice. Will they regret that choice? perhaps. But no one did anything to anyone here.
I agree with you on the agency bit.
You're right. I just really dislike him.